That is the nerve center of the whole issue. In reality, it is a subject that is not well-studied because it is difficult to identify. In fact, I was forced to carry out these world records to give a little visibility to issues that otherwise would remain in the shadows.
Few people are able to deal with complex, truly complex issues; so in the end, even important things are likely to remain on the margins of the debate simply because they are difficult to disclose. I also share the opinion that we must try to make the concepts as simple as possible, but not simpler, as Einstein said.
And in some theoretical issues, things cannot be simplified, except at the cost of emptying them of meaning. Nevertheless there are a lot of studies that are falsely complex and, behind an obscure language, they hide a void of meaning.
That fraudulent way of doing research, so fashionable now, doesn't concern me.
When I talk about complexity, I refer to a real complexity.
I like theses that can be demonstrated, somehow or other.
And my case is perhaps the only one in which philosophical and psycholinguistic theses are supported by records.
What I mean is that if someone wants to deny the validity of my theories, he/she has to do nothing but be able to do mathematical mental calculations with numbers larger than 30 digits each, and do it using a different technique than mine. This is the only way to show that today there is a better conception of mental images than mine.
Everything else is just useless chatter. I hypothesize, however, that nobody will do it. It’s much more convenient to ignore than to take up the challenge. I don’t care if someone breaks my records, maybe it could be quite easy for someone to break some (not all) of them.
Except for the addition of two numbers of thirty digits each (done in the same way I performed it) which I think is difficult to break, the other records can be overcome with a little exercise.
Anyway, to be fair, without the tension of the public, I'm also able to do better.
The problem is another: my concern is that no one understands how I can do them, that is, nobody understands the scope and breadth of applications of what I have discovered or, at least, clarified.